Living With Risk
But nobody can simply declare the geological story finished.
As of late summer 2026, earthquake activity near Grindavík and the Sundhnúkur crater row was low, but scientists were still recording slow uplift and continuing magma accumulation beneath the Svartsengi area. The Icelandic Meteorological Office says another magma intrusion — and possibly another eruption — remains a realistic scenario. Previous events have sometimes provided only 20 minutes to a few hours of warning.
That is the reality of living with risk.
Could you go back? That is the question I would ask every A-level student visiting Iceland. Suppose Grindavík was your town. You have been away for two or three years. You now have another house. You have made new friends. Perhaps your parents have different jobs. Your younger brother likes his new school. Then someone tells you it is possible to return.
Would you want your old life back badly enough to live with the possibility of another evacuation? Or would you decide that home is no longer a place — it is wherever your family happens to be?
There isn’t a correct answer. And perhaps that is why Grindavík is such an important geographical case study. Yes, it teaches us about constructive plate margins, magma intrusions, fissure eruptions, hazard management and resilience.
But travel should teach us something more than what will appear in an examination.
Grindavík asks us to think about citizenship, community, responsibility and belonging. It asks us to imagine standing in someone else’s shoes.
When I take students to Iceland, I want them to look at the landscape. I want them to understand the science. I certainly want them to take photographs.
But I want you to think about the human impact, and the next time someone tells you that 3,800 people were evacuated from Grindavík, don’t simply remember the number… remember that every one of those numbers had a front door. And behind every front door was a life.